![]() is there anything I can do with that?Īll - thanks for your inputs. This is the first client I have to deal with MDaemon for :) It is mapped manually via "file explorer -> map network drive"īrad (MDaemon) - all are using POP. the switches are quite old there and it is a mix of different brands. I'm actually thinking that there could be a switch that could be causing some issues. that thin clients (connecting to a Win 2012 Server on the same LAN/subnet) are experiencing this issues way more often. what does it mean please? Is that something that could help if disabled? If so, where can I find thats what I' would not expect either. If "offline files" in shares have not been disabled. I really hate the on-prem email solutions as it is causing a proper headache from time to time :/ however need to deal with this PST issues meanwhile. I'm in process of migrating from on-prem MDeamon to Exchange Online that I've been using for years with other clients and is working with no issues. The 2nd reason is that users have very limited drive space assigned (thin client especially) as they have just few Gig left and can't store their big PST files locally. So he decided to move it to Synology NAS and map it from there. ![]() There was an attack several months agon that caused that several users got lost their emails that were locally stored in PSTs. The reason for having it as network drive: I took over this setup from previous IT guy. I've checked logs on NAS and have found some I/O warning but can't really link it to the PST issues as not always when there is a PST corruption, I see that log in NAS. The NAS was then restarted which restored access to all - however, since then, the issues with PST are repeating randomly for users. It happened like 1.5 months ago when everyone lost access to their PST in NAS. I would agree with Jono But theNAS would not have any errors or show any logs as this would be rather "normal" for the NAS to have either NICs or IOPs saturation. I would say that the NAS is underperforming and causing the corruption.Ĭheck the NAS for errors and the disk and network performance. The corruption is likely caused by PST still being written and the user(s) logoff. The same question as to why using mapped drive ? The OS would then think it is a local drive and not warn users of any potential network or NAS IOPs contention issues especially if "offline files" in shares have not been disabled. or I'm not sure.Īny help would be great as I've been dealing with this for weeks now. So it is either SYNOLOGY or network somehow breaking the file. I have moved PST for few ppl to their local drive and since then, they have never reported this issue again. I however need to find the root cause of this issue. As it takes quite a long time however, recently I've started to recover pst file from backup/snapshot as it is much faster. I run a scanpst to repair the file and it helps. I am not sure what is going on, but very often, they cannot open outlook and get message that " Cannot open your default folder. Ppl with thin clients reports this randomly on weekly basis. ![]() Ppl with laptops experienced this issue as well but only once or twice - when I fixed it, it was stable. There are ppl with laptops and ppl using thin clients. Their PST is located on SYNOLOGY NAS and accessible mapped network drive. They use MDeamon for emails and Outlook 2010 as an email client. Oh… yeah.I'm facing an annoying issue with users that are getting their PST corrupted few times a week. Spark! Pro series – 11th August 2023 Spiceworks Originals.I work for an Architecture and Engineering firm with about 100 employees including 2 IT people (myself who handles the typical day to day operations).Īll employees have laptops and most of our infrastructure is cloud-based (Azure, Intune, filesharing. Best, easiest software deployment suite? Software.Snap! - Deadly Recipes, Mouse Hearing Loss Reversal, Certainty Trap, Free Rides Spiceworks Originalsįlashback: August 11, 2003: The Blaster worm begins to spread, infecting Windows XP and Windows 2000 (Read more HERE.)īonus Flashback: August 11, 1960: First object successfull. ![]() if 10 machines are connected to a 100 mbps connection and one machine downloads a 1GB file, are the others dead in the water until it finishes? More importantly, why or why not? I'm having trouble findi. Can one machine consume all available bandwidth? Ex.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |